Monday, July 22, 2013

The Volterra Trade (continued)

Naturally, the caveats.

A couple days ago, I dashed off a quick post chronicling two (virtual) trades that I made on the morning of Friday, July 19.  The first was an additional investment in Synacor Inc. (SYNC), based on the premise that if I felt the stock was undervalued at $3.52 a share, I should really consider it even more undervalued at $3.00 a share.  The second was a new investment in Volterra Semiconductor Corp, which, now that I have a little spare time I feel I should explain in more depth.

Volterra Semiconductor Corp (VLTR)
Current Price (as of close, Thursday, July 18, 2013): $15.99

First, the basics: Volterra is a manufacturing company in the opaque but remarkably pivotal industry known by the technojargon terminology of "semiconductors".  Bascially, this is the industry that designs, makes, and sells all the various kinds of computer chips that allow ... well, basically everything we use on a daily basis to run.  Volterra, like so many semiconductor companies, exists in a much narrower band of the industry, specifically that of voltage regulators.

In a computer or other sensitive electronic instrument, it is generally very important that the voltages that are used by the chips and components maintains a controlled and consistent level.  Unfortunately, every system has noise and imperfection; add in the fact that almost all computer systems get their power from an alternating current power line (50 points to Nikola Tesla), a computer or electronic system needs to have components that ensure that the noisy, messy and potentially alternating voltage coming into the system gets turned into a constant, consistent, controlled voltage before it gets used.  That's where voltage regulators and analog/digital power management devices, like those made by Volterra, come into play.

The good news for Volterra is considerable.  Voltage regulators aren't going anywhere anytime soon, and with a still increasing stockpile of cash and effectively no debt, neither is Volterra.  Nevertheless, over the last year, Volterra has dropped noticeably: as high as $24 a share a year ago, VLTR dropped as low as $13 a share in late April.  This precipitous drop is tied to the declining laptop/notebook market: notebooks have made up as much of a third of Volterra's revenue, and with notebooks being replaced by smartphones and tablets, those sales have dropped quickly in the last few years.  This seemingly convinced investors that VLTR's price/book ratio was far too high, and VLTR has stayed a low level.

In spite of this drop, Volterra is still a very strong company.  Along with its hefty cash store, Volterra is still doing a very solid business providing regulators and chips for high-performance server systems, and is building a promising new business in the solar energy industry.  Though their low price and price/book ratio is still tied to the declining notebook market, Volterra has been aware of the notebook decline for sometime, and has been deemphasizing notebooks as a component of their R&D for almost a year.  In an industry where products get turned over and replaced very quickly (as often as once every year or two), that foresight will pay off quite soon.  Also, the power management semiconductors market is highly fractured, creating the potential for large, established players like Volterra to absorb the business of smaller companies that don't weather the laptop retraction as well.

Overall, with a low forward P/E ratio of 16, a solid cash pile, no debt, solid business management and almost $3 million in insider ownership, VLTR appears to have a considerable amount of long-term upside potential and very little long-term downside potential.  And, with an earnings announcement on Monday the 22nd and low expectations already folded in from the declining notebook market, if forward earnings beat estimates by a noticeable amount, there's even the potential for a large short-term upside (over the next three months).  To me, VLTR seems like a very solid (if not necessarily very fast cash-in) investment.

Friday, July 19, 2013

The Volterra Trade

As usual, the caveats.

Hello all.  Unfortunately, I don't have time for a full post, but since I'm not using real money, I figure the only to keep myself honest is to make a record of my virtual trades as soon as they're made, so I will report the trade now and give a fuller explanation later.

This post is to report on two trades.  First, Synacor (SYNC) continues to hover around $3.00 a share, well below the price I bought it at.  As mentioned in my last post, I have been able to find no publicly available financial information about the company to justify this rather precipitous drop.  At this point, of course, my first instinct is that I have made some kind of mistake: that everyone else knows something I don't and that I should get out before things get any worse.  However, if I am trying to approach these stock trades rationally, this reaction makes very little sense.  Fundamentally, I have acquired no new information about Synacor or its financial state; since my investing thesis in the original trade was that Syancor was undervalued at $3.52 a share, then rationally, I should conclude that it is even more undervalued at $3.00 a share.  So, the most rational response to this price dip, in the absence of new information, is to purchase more SYNC, rather than sell what I have.  So that is precisely what I have done.  I (virtually) purchased 330 additional shares of SYNC at $3.00 a share, the closing price as of last night, bringing my total ownership up to 895 shares.

The other trade (which as I mentioned, I will explain in more depth later) was an investment in semiconductor chip manufacturer Volterra (VLTR).  Volterra produces and sells specialized voltage regulators that deliver a consistent, reliable voltage to electronics like laptops, servers and so on.  I purchased 125 shares of VLTR at 15.99 a share (last night's closing price).

That's all for now.  A more in depth explanation of the Volterra trade will come soon, likely before their earnings announcement on Monday.

Monday, July 1, 2013

A Possible Opportunity?

Well, there's no denying it's been a pretty rough few weeks for the ol' virtual portfolio.  Since I made my first virtual trade, the value of Synacor (SYNC) has fallen from $3.52 a share down to $3.10 a share at close on Friday.  (Fortunately, the price recovered a bit today to $3.28 a share, but the portfolio is still down almost $150 from the initial captial investment.)  So, not a great result for the first few weeks of investing.

Interestingly, though I have tried, I have been unable to determine what precisely drove the rather precipitous drop in Synacor's value over the last few weeks.  The only real news to come out of the company was announcement of a new office in Boston back at the end of May (see here); an announcement which initially seemed to cause the stock to spike 7% in single day of trading, and which seems to speak as much to the company's growth and solidity as its weakness.  It may of course just be one of those feedback loops based on little or no information which are impossible to predict.  Nevertheless, it is my hope that in the future I can find better resources for determining why people are buying or selling a stock.

An interesting potential opportunity came to my attention a few days ago, one that I'm sure may already knew about and some have already dived into.  As of last Friday, June 28, Rupert Murdoch's octopus like global media empire (News Corp) was spun off into two companies.  The lion's share of the business remained, comprised primarily of the entertainment properties: things like 20th Century Fox, the Fox broadcast networks, Fox News, Fox Sports (excepting Australia) and so on.  However, the publishing arm of the business -- including the company's newspapers like the Wall Street Journal and the The Times of London along with Harper Collins publishing and several other properties -- was spun off into a smaller independent company.  Confusingly, the smaller spin-off company took on the name News Corp and stock ticker symbols (NWSA and NWSV) while the remaining company switched its name to Fox and its ticker symbols to FOXA and FOXV.

Now, after reading Greenblatt, my ears naturally prick up at the sound of the word "spin-off".  So when I read about this one, I was pretty excited.  After all, the new spun-off company would include the franchises carrying the stigma of the News of the World hacking scandal, which might scare off investors and keep the price down. Unfortunately while this situation does have many of the details of a desirable spinoff, it also has some things going against it.  First of all, while the spinoff did create a considerably smaller company (less than 1/7 the original size by market capitalization) the original company was so large that the new News Corp is still a Fortune 500 company!  So the new News Corp is hardly outside the eye of institutional investors.  In addition, the movement of capital back and forth over the last few years makes it very difficult to get a handle on the likely earnings of the new News Corp, even with the Pro Forma financial statements available in the separation's Form 10 filing.

To get a stab at a fair price for the new stock, I tried using price/sales and price/operating income and comparing it with other publishing companies.  According to price/sales, the price is near the lower end, but well within a standard price for a publishing company; according to price/operating income, the price of new News Corp is actually a bit high.  So, despite the baseline advantages of spin-offs, it seems that the price of the new News Corp is being held up by institutional scrutiny, and thus not necessarily a terrific opportunity as yet.

Nevertheless, I'll wait and see if selling pressure pushes down the price over the next week or two.  If the price were to drop down around 10 or 11, then we might have a reasonable bargain on our hand.  But I doubt that's going to happen.  So for now, the portfolio will stay as it is.